Back to The House of LitTHE METHOD

Two rankings, two different questions

Literary assessment and reader response remain separate.

The default shelf ranks books by an automated assessment of the complete manuscript. Readers can instead choose the reader ranking, built from private questionnaires by people who show credible knowledge of the book.

01

Prose and voice

30%

Precision, clarity, rhythm, dialogue, imagery and tonal control across the complete book.

02

Story craft

20%

Conflict, development, emotional effect and whether the story fulfils its own intentions.

03

Characterisation

15%

Distinctiveness, depth, consistency and credible change.

04

Structure and pacing

15%

Shape, momentum, balance and control from beginning to end.

05

Originality

10%

Freshness of conception, treatment and authorial choices.

06

Coherence and execution

10%

Internal consistency and the technical control needed for an uninterrupted read.

The literary ranking

Every complete book is assessed under the same genre-aware rubric. AI-assisted and entirely human-written books are treated identically. Popularity, sales, advertising and the author’s identity do not affect the result. A low rating does not itself disqualify a complete, readable book.

The reader ranking

Readers never enter a number. They answer questions based on how much they actually read. Specific memories, character observations and internally consistent answers establish reading confidence; liking the book is never evidence of having read it. A thoughtful negative response counts exactly as a positive one.

Private answers, public aggregates

Reader answers and email addresses are never published. A public reader score appears only after at least three credible questionnaires, limiting the influence of any single response.